Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Ai2
Ai2

Ai2 · Olmo 3

Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Open weightsGenerally availableApache 2.0

Ai2's fully open (weights, data, code) 32B reasoning model; no first-party paid API.

AA Intelligence
7.1#122 of 142
Price
Self-host
Output speed
—
Context window
66K tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#122 of 142
    7independentIntelligence Index v4.3; reasoning; estimatedArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench#25 of 56
    69.5%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: Fugu at 92.9%

Agents and tool use

  • τ²-Bench#85 of 88
    0%independenttelecom; reasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: GLM-5.2 at 99.1%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#111 of 142
    59.1%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#114 of 147
    6.3%independentno tools; reasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#124 of 139
    0%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#131 of 139
    0%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
aime-2025 · AIME 2025; reasoning77.3%independentArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗
Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) · reasoning0%independentArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗
IFBench · reasoning66%independentArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗
AA-Omniscience Index · reasoning-43.4 indexindependentArtificial Analysis: Olmo 3.1 32B Think ↗

Specs

Released
December 12, 2025
Parameters
32.2B
Size class
10 to 40B
Input
text
Output
text
Context
66K tokens
Max output
Not published

    Will it fit your budget?

    The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

    Plan a stack →

    Compare with

    • AmazonAmazon Nova Pro7
    • CohereCommand A7
    • Liquid AILFM2.5-8B-A1B7.2
    • NVIDIANemotron 3 Nano 4B7.4