Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Cohere
Cohere

Cohere · Command A

Command A

Open weightsSupersededCC-BY-NC-4.0 (non-commercial research)

Dense 111B enterprise Command model, now outscored by the cheaper open Command A+.

AA Intelligence
7#124 of 142
Input / output per 1M
$2.50/ $10.00
Output speed
53tok/s
Context window
256K tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#124 of 142
    7independentIntelligence Index v4.3; non-reasoning; estimatedArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench#45 of 56
    28.7%independentnon-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: Fugu at 92.9%

Agents and tool use

  • τ²-Bench#74 of 88
    15.2%independenttelecom; non-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: GLM-5.2 at 99.1%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#122 of 142
    52.7%independentnon-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#139 of 147
    4%independentno tools; non-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#121 of 139
    0%independentnon-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#114 of 139
    21.3%independentnon-reasoningArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
aime-2025 · AIME 2025; non-reasoning13%independentArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗
Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) · non-reasoning0.8%independentArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗
IFBench · non-reasoning36.5%independentArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗
AA-Omniscience Index · non-reasoning-48.3 indexindependentArtificial Analysis: Command A ↗

Specs

Released
March 13, 2025
Parameters
111B
Size class
100 to 500B
Input
text
Output
text
Context
256K tokens
Max output
Not published
Blended 70/30
$4.75 / 1M
First token
2.04s
  • Price: Artificial Analysis: Command A ↗ Cohere first-party API price as listed by Artificial Analysis.
  • Speed: Artificial Analysis leaderboard (Command A, median across providers or first-party as shown) ↗

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • AmazonAmazon Nova Pro7
  • Ai2Olmo 3.1 32B Think7.1
  • Liquid AILFM2.5-8B-A1B7.2
  • AmazonAmazon Nova Lite6.7