Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Anthropic
Anthropic

Anthropic · Claude 5

Claude Opus 5.5

Closed weightsGenerally availableNewproprietary

Anthropic's new default flagship (Sep 2026) for long-running agentic coding and knowledge work, priced below Opus 5.

AA Intelligence
57.6#1 of 142
Input / output per 1M
$4.00/ $20.00
Output speed
81tok/s
Context window
1M tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#1 of 142
    58independentv4.3.2, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
    51independentv4.3.2, medium effort (API default)Artificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • SciCode#1 of 94
    66.9%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0#2 of 88
    66.4%vendorxhigh effort, Claude Code harness, ±2.6 SEAnthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
    59.6%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 4.0), max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Mythos 5.1 at 60.9%

  • SWE-bench Pro#1 of 31
    89.9%vendorAnthropic-run, max effort, avg of 5 trials (set not specified)Claude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 89.9%

Agents and tool use

  • GDPval-AA#1 of 103
    1846independentGDPval-AA v2.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1846

  • OSWorld-Verified#4 of 16
    81.8%vendorOSWorld 2.0 partial score (strict 48.7%), max effortClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 84.8%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#1 of 147
    67.7%vendorwith tools, max effortAnthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
    64.4%vendorno tools, max effortClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A ↗
    61.4%independentAA run, no tools, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#3 of 139
    31.7%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

  • ARC-AGI-2#2 of 25
    93.3%independenthigh effort; ARC Prize verified, cost $0.41/taskARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗
    91.7%independentmax effort; ARC Prize verified, cost $1.85/taskARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 95%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#5 of 139
    84.7%independentAA-LCR v1.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

  • MMMU-Pro#1 of 72
    87.7%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 87.7%

Human preference

  • LMArena WebDev#1 of 54
    1818independentclaude-opus-5.5-max; 1,219 votes (preliminary)LMArena Code Arena | WebDev leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1818

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
SWE-bench Multilingual · max effort, avg of 5 trials93.9%vendorClaude Opus 5.5 System Card ↗
SWE-bench Multimodal · max effort, avg of 5 trials61.4%vendorClaude Opus 5.5 System Card ↗
DeepSWE v1.1 · max effort, avg of 5 trials74.2%vendorClaude Opus 5.5 System Card ↗
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) · max effort54.4%vendorAnthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 · max effort58.7%vendorAnthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
AutomationBench · run by Zapier, no fallback models40%vendorAnthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
AA Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Claude Code harness, max effort (DeepSWE 68.4 / Terminal-Bench 4.0 63.1 / SWE-Atlas-QnA 66.4)66%independentArtificial Analysis Coding Agent Index ↗
ARC-AGI-1 · max effort, semi-private97.5%independentARC Prize leaderboard data ↗

Specs

Released
September 22, 2026
Parameters
Undisclosed
Size class
Undisclosed
Input
text, image
Output
text
Context
1M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Cached input
$0.20 / 1M
Blended 70/30
$8.80 / 1M
First token
18.70s
  • Price: Claude API pricing ↗ Cache reads 0.05x base input. Batch 50% off. Fast mode (research preview) $8/$40. Adaptive thinking always on; default effort medium.
  • Speed: Artificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5.5 (medium effort; no speed data yet at max effort) ↗

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • AnthropicClaude Fable 5.153.4
  • OpenAIGPT-6 Astra52.7
  • AnthropicClaude Opus 550.8
  • AnthropicClaude Fable 549.6