Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Anthropic
Anthropic

Anthropic · Claude 5

Claude Fable 5.1

Closed weightsGenerally availableNewproprietary

Anthropic's most capable generally available model for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work; successor to Fable 5 at the same token prices.

AA Intelligence
53.4#2 of 142
Input / output per 1M
$10.00/ $50.00
Output speed
58tok/s
Context window
1M tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#2 of 142
    53independentv4.3.2, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗
    51independentv4.3.2, high effort (API default)Artificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 (high) ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • SciCode#2 of 94
    63.1%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0#4 of 88
    57.9%independentmax effort, Claude Code harness, ±3.8Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard ↗
    55.8%vendormax effort, Claude Code harness (Mythos 5.1 same model: 60.9%)Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
    52%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 4.0), max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Mythos 5.1 at 60.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 2.x#1 of 103
    91.4%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 2.1), max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5.1 at 91.4%

  • SWE-bench Pro#2 of 31
    81.2%vendorAnthropic-run, max effort, avg of 5 trials (set not specified)Claude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card, Table 8.1.A ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 89.9%

Agents and tool use

  • GDPval-AA#2 of 103
    1735independentGDPval-AA v2.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1846

  • OSWorld-Verified#7 of 16
    77.9%vendorOSWorld 2.0 partial score (strict 41.7%), max effort; Opus 5.5 system card later reports 80.7/42.8 under a revised harnessAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 84.8%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#10 of 142
    93.7%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#2 of 147
    65%vendorwith tools, max effort (Opus 5.5 post later lists 65.6%)Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
    60.9%vendorno tools, max effortAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
    59.1%independentAA run, no tools, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#6 of 139
    29.7%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

  • ARC-AGI-2#5 of 25
    90%independentmax effort; ARC Prize verified, cost $4.49/taskARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 95%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#4 of 139
    85.3%independentAA-LCR v1.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

Human preference

  • LMArena Text#3 of 54
    1499independentclaude-fable-5.1-max; 5,783 votesLMArena text leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5 at 1506

  • LMArena WebDev#3 of 54
    1755independentclaude-fable-5.1-max; 4,916 votesLMArena Code Arena | WebDev leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1818

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
SWE-bench Multilingual · max effort89.1%vendorClaude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card ↗
SWE-bench Multimodal · max effort54.7%vendorClaude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card ↗
DeepSWE v1.1 · max effort, avg of 5 trials67.4%vendorClaude Fable 5.1 / Mythos 5.1 System Card ↗
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 · max effort52.6%vendorAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
CursorBench 3.2.0 · max effort73.4%vendorAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
AutomationBench31.4%vendorAnthropic: Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ↗
AA Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Claude Code harness, max effort with fallback (DeepSWE 64.3 / Terminal-Bench 4.0 57.6 / SWE-Atlas-QnA 64.8)62.2%independentArtificial Analysis Coding Agent Index ↗
ARC-AGI-1 · max effort, semi-private97.5%independentARC Prize leaderboard data ↗

Specs

Released
September 1, 2026
Parameters
Undisclosed
Size class
Undisclosed
Input
text, image
Output
text
Context
1M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Cached input
$0.25 / 1M
Blended 70/30
$22.00 / 1M
First token
20.56s
  • Price: Claude API pricing ↗ Cache reads 0.025x base input (down from $1 on Fable 5). Batch 50% off. Default effort high.
  • Speed: Artificial Analysis: Claude Fable 5.1 (high effort) ↗

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • OpenAIGPT-6 Astra52.7
  • AnthropicClaude Opus 550.8
  • AnthropicClaude Fable 549.6
  • AnthropicClaude Opus 5.557.6