Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Google
Google

Google · Gemini 3

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Closed weightsPreviewproprietary

Google's current (still preview) Pro model; by AA's v4.3 index it now trails the cheaper Gemini 3.7/3.8 Flash.

AA Intelligence
29.7#39 of 142
Input / output per 1M
$2.00/ $12.00
Output speed
122tok/s
Context window
1M tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#39 of 142
    30independentv4.3.2, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • SciCode#11 of 94
    58.7%independentAA run, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0#38 of 88
    4%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 4.0), high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Claude Mythos 5.1 at 60.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 2.x#32 of 103
    73.8%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 2.1), high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗
    68.5%vendorTerminal-Bench 2.0, Terminus-2 harnessGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5.1 at 91.4%

  • SWE-bench Pro#21 of 31
    54.2%vendorpublic set, single attempt, Thinking (High)Google DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 89.9%

  • SWE-bench Verified#2 of 16
    80.6%vendorsingle attempt, Thinking (High)Google DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: Claude Sonnet 5 at 85.2%

Agents and tool use

  • GDPval-AA#63 of 103
    776independentGDPval-AA v2.1, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1846

  • τ²-Bench#7 of 88
    99.3%vendortelecom (retail 90.8%)Google DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗
    95.6%independentAA run, telecom, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: GLM-5.2 at 99.1%

  • BrowseComp#4 of 14
    85.9%vendorsearch + Python + browseGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 91.5%

  • MCP Atlas#8 of 9
    69.2%vendorGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 84.2%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#9 of 142
    94.1%independentAA run, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#15 of 147
    51.4%vendorsearch (blocklist) + codeGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗
    47%independentAA run, no tools, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗
    44.4%vendorno tools, Thinking (High)Google DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#23 of 139
    17.7%independentAA run, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

  • ARC-AGI-2#10 of 25
    77.1%independentARC Prize verifiedARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 95%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#19 of 139
    82%independentAA-LCR v1.1, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

  • MMMU-Pro#11 of 72
    82.4%independentAA run, high thinkingArtificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 87.7%

Human preference

  • LMArena Text#9 of 54
    1487independentgemini-3.1-pro-preview; 106,951 votesLMArena text leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5 at 1506

  • LMArena WebDev#43 of 54
    1447independentgemini-3.1-pro-preview; 22,889 votesLMArena Code Arena | WebDev leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1818

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
LiveCodeBench Pro2887 ElovendorGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗
MRCR v2 (8-needle) · 128k average84.9%vendorGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗
APEX-Agents33.5%vendorGoogle DeepMind: Gemini 3.1 Pro ↗

Specs

Released
February 19, 2026
Parameters
Undisclosed
Size class
Undisclosed
Input
text, image, audio, video
Output
text
Context
1M tokens
Max output
64K tokens
Cached input
$0.20 / 1M
Blended 70/30
$5.00 / 1M
First token
30.34s
  • Price: Gemini Developer API pricing ↗ Prompts <=200K tokens; >200K is $4/$18 (cache $0.40). No free tier. Still preview; DeepMind page says 'Gemini 3.5 Pro coming soon'.
  • Speed: Artificial Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • AlibabaQwen3.7-Max29
  • MiniMaxMiniMax-M329
  • MBZUAIK2 Horizon 375B A23B30.5
  • Z.aiGLM-528