Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Baidu
Baidu

Baidu · ERNIE 4.5

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Open weightsSupersededApache-2.0

Baidu's open-weight 300B/47B-active MoE text model from mid-2025; still Baidu's largest open-weight LLM.

AA Intelligence
7.5#118 of 142
Price
Self-host
Output speed
—
Context window
131K tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#118 of 142
    8independentv4.3.2 (AA estimate; independent evaluation forthcoming)Artificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench#34 of 56
    46.7%independentAAArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: Fugu at 92.9%

Agents and tool use

  • τ²-Bench#82 of 88
    0%independentAA, telecomArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: GLM-5.2 at 99.1%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#146 of 147
    3.3%independentAA, no toolsArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • GPQA Diamond#69 of 142
    81.1%independentAAArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • CritPt#100 of 139
    0%independentAAArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
aime-2025 · AA, AIME 202541.3%independentArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗
Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) · AA6.1%independentArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗
IFBench (AA) · AA39.1%independentArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗
AA-Omniscience Index · AA-35.1 index (-100..100)independentArtificial Analysis: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B ↗

Specs

Released
June 30, 2025
Parameters
300B total, 47B active
Size class
100 to 500B
Input
text
Output
text
Context
131K tokens
Max output
Not published

    Will it fit your budget?

    The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

    Plan a stack →

    Compare with

    • Nous ResearchHermes 4 405B7.5
    • NVIDIANemotron 3 Nano 4B7.4
    • PerplexitySonar Pro (Sonar API)7.6
    • StepFunStep3 VL 10B7.7