Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Anthropic
Anthropic

Anthropic · Claude 5

Claude Opus 5

Closed weightsSupersededproprietary

Previous Opus flagship (Jul 2026), now a legacy model superseded by the cheaper Claude Opus 5.5.

AA Intelligence
50.8#4 of 142
Input / output per 1M
$5.00/ $25.00
Output speed
58tok/s
Context window
1M tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#4 of 142
    51independentv4.3.2, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • SciCode#20 of 94
    56.4%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0#5 of 88
    53.9%independentxhigh effort, Claude Code harness, ±3.2Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard ↗
    51.8%independentmax effort, Claude Code harness, ±3.4Terminal-Bench 4.0 official leaderboard ↗
    49%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 4.0), max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Mythos 5.1 at 60.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 2.x#5 of 103
    89.1%independentAA run (Terminal-Bench 2.1), max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5.1 at 91.4%

  • SWE-bench Pro#4 of 31
    79.2%vendorAnthropic-run, max effortClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A (Opus 5 column) ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 89.9%

Agents and tool use

  • GDPval-AA#3 of 103
    1708independentGDPval-AA v2.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1846

  • OSWorld-Verified#8 of 16
    74%vendorOSWorld 2.0 partial (strict 37.2%), revised harnessClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A (Opus 5 column) ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 84.8%

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#14 of 142
    93.2%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#5 of 147
    63.6%vendorwith tools, max effortClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A (Opus 5 column) ↗
    56.6%vendorno tools, max effortClaude Opus 5.5 System Card, Table 8.1.A (Opus 5 column) ↗
    54.9%independentAA run, no tools, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 61.4%

  • CritPt#7 of 139
    29.1%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: GPT-5.6 Sol at 32.3%

  • ARC-AGI-2#4 of 25
    90.4%independentmax effort; ARC Prize verified, cost $2.06/taskARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 95%

  • ARC-AGI-3#2 of 9
    30.2%independenthigh effort; ARC Prize semi-privateARC Prize leaderboard data (semi-private) ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 62.7%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#38 of 139
    79.3%independentAA-LCR v1.1, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

  • MMMU-Pro#5 of 72
    84.7%independentAA run, max effortArtificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 87.7%

Human preference

  • LMArena Text#7 of 54
    1493independentclaude-opus-5-high; 42,617 votesLMArena text leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5 at 1506

  • LMArena WebDev#4 of 54
    1692independentclaude-opus-5-max; 14,351 votesLMArena Code Arena | WebDev leaderboard ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 1818

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
AA Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Claude Code harness, max effort (DeepSWE 62.5 / Terminal-Bench 4.0 54.5 / SWE-Atlas-QnA 62.1)59.7%independentArtificial Analysis Coding Agent Index ↗

Specs

Released
July 24, 2026
Parameters
Undisclosed
Size class
Undisclosed
Input
text, image
Output
text
Context
1M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Cached input
$0.50 / 1M
Blended 70/30
$11.00 / 1M
First token
37.90s
  • Price: Claude API pricing ↗ Legacy but still available. Fast mode $10/$50. Superseded by Opus 5.5, which is cheaper ($4/$20).
  • Speed: Artificial Analysis: Claude Opus 5 (max effort) ↗

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • AnthropicClaude Fable 549.6
  • OpenAIGPT-6 Astra52.7
  • AnthropicClaude Fable 5.153.4
  • MetaMuse Spark 1.348.1