Skip to contentT/TTokens or Towers

Compare

LeaderboardEvery tracked model, ranked and priced side by sideBenchmarksWhat each test measures and who leads itPricesAPI, media, and hardware rates with a cost calculator

Plan

Stack plannerSix questions to a priced local and hosted stackShortlistOur picks for subscriptions, APIs, and hardwareEnterpriseSeat plans against self-hosting for a whole team

Build

HardwareGPUs and workstations, and which models they fitHostsWhere to rent open-weight inference, and for how muchHarnessesCoding agents and the models they drive

Lab

FindingsResults from our own evaluationsScanAudit a repo’s AI usage in the browserMethodWhere the numbers come from and how we check them
Data checked September 25, 2026
Data checked September 25, 2026
Plan a stack
T/TTokens or Towers

An independent guide to AI models, what they cost, and the hardware to run them. No account, no API key, no sponsors.

Compare

  • Leaderboard
  • Benchmarks
  • Prices

Plan

  • Stack planner
  • Shortlist
  • Enterprise

Build

  • Hardware
  • Hosts
  • Harnesses

Lab

  • Findings
  • Scan
  • Method
Data checked September 25, 2026 · Every number links to its sourceRSS · Source on GitHub
Leaderboard/Apodex
A

Apodex · Apodex

Apodex 1.1

Closed weightsGenerally availableNewproprietary

Closed reasoning model from US company Apodex with text and image input, served via its own API.

AA Intelligence
26.4#56 of 151
Input / output per 1M
$0.30/ $3.00
Output speed
—
Context window
256K tokens

Composite indexes

  • Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index#56 of 151
    26independentIntelligence Index v4.3; reasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 58

Coding

  • SciCode#61 of 100
    45.5%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 66.9%

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0#95 of 96
    0%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 70.6%

  • Terminal-Bench 2.x#37 of 105
    69.7%independentTerminal-Bench 2.1; reasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Fable 5.1 at 91.4%

Agents and tool use

  • GDPval-AA#44 of 109
    1189independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Muse Wonder Full at 1857

Reasoning and knowledge

  • GPQA Diamond#54 of 144
    86.4%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: GPT-6 Astra at 96.1%

  • Humanity’s Last Exam#54 of 153
    34.1%independentno tools; reasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 64.5%

  • CritPt#57 of 144
    4.6%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Muse Wonder Full at 33%

Vision and long context

  • AA Long Context Reasoning#46 of 144
    79.3%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Kimi K3 at 88.7%

  • MMMU-Pro#20 of 72
    79.2%independentreasoningArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

    Leader: Claude Opus 5.5 at 87.7%

Other published results

ResultScoreReported bySource
tau2-Bench Banking (AA) · reasoning25.2%independentArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗
AA-Omniscience Index · reasoning-21.9 indexindependentArtificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗

Specs

Released
August 30, 2026
Parameters
Undisclosed
Size class
Undisclosed
Input
text, image
Output
text
Context
256K tokens
Max output
Not published
Cached input
$0.03 / 1M
Blended 70/30
$1.11 / 1M
  • Price: Artificial Analysis: Apodex 1.1 ↗ First-party (Apodex) price as listed by Artificial Analysis.

Will it fit your budget?

The planner prices this model against local hardware and other APIs for your workload.

Plan a stack →

Compare with

  • Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B26.7
  • Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code26
  • XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro26
  • Moonshot AIKimi K2.627